Posted by 
I cannot remember the last time I went a full day without being tracked online. Last week, I was just talking to my friend about needing new running shoes, and suddenly my social media feeds were flooded with sneaker ads. This is surveillance capitalism in action a term that has entered our vocabulary but perhaps not fully entered our understanding.
Surveillance capitalism represents a new economic order that claims human experience as free raw material for hidden commercial practices. As a sociology researcher who has spent the past decade examining digital culture, I have watched this phenomenon evolve from fringe concern to mainstream reality.
From Convenience to Control: The Evolution of Digital Surveillance
The foundations of surveillance capitalism were laid innocently enough. We wanted more personalized experiences online, more relevant search results, and more convenient shopping recommendations. Who does not love it when technology seems to get us? I certainly did.
But something shifted around 2010. The collection of our data moved beyond improving services and became about predicting and modifying our behavior. Our digital breadcrumbs the websites we visit, the posts we like, the products we browse became the raw materials for sophisticated prediction products that could anticipate what we might do next.
It started with search engines and social platforms offering free services, explains Dr. Maria Velasquez, whom I interviewed for my research last year. But the business model evolved. Now we are not just the users we are the product being sold to advertisers.
The Hidden Social Costs of Free Digital Services
We often hear that if a service is free, you are probably the product. But this simplification misses something crucial about surveillance capitalism it is not just about advertising. It is about power.
The power dynamic between tech companies and users has become increasingly asymmetrical. While I can see the convenience of having my preferred coffee shop suggested as I walk down a new street, I cannot see how my data is being used to shape political discourse, influence markets, or reinforce societal biases.
I remember attending a technology conference in 2019 where a developer casually mentioned that their facial recognition algorithm could predict sexual orientation with 91% accuracy. The room fell silent. Not because the technology existed, but because nobody had considered whether it should exist. This is the moral vacuum at the heart of surveillance capitalism – technological capability outpacing ethical frameworks.
Breaking the Invisible Chains: Reclaiming Digital Agency
Is it possible to participate in modern society without surrendering our personal data? This question keeps me up at night, especially as I navigate raising children in this digital panopticon.
Last month, I experimented with going data dark.using privacy tools, alternative search engines, and opting out wherever possible. It was exhausting. Websites failed to load properly. Services I relied on became unusable. Friends could not find me on platforms where we coordinated social activities.
Digital participation has become virtually mandatory for social and economic inclusion, creating what sociologists call forced consent. We click agree not because we have meaningfully consented to data collection, but because the alternative is digital exile.
Towards a More Equitable Digital Future
The solution to surveillance capitalism cannot be individual action alone. No amount of privacy settings can address a systemic issue that requires collective response through regulation, corporate accountability, and reimagined technology.
The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) represents a step in the right direction, shifting from a model of implied consent to one requiring explicit permission for data collection. But regulations often lag behind technological development.
What gives me hope is the growing public awareness. Five years ago, conversations about data privacy were confined to tech circles. Today, they happen at dinner tables. My neighbor recently asked me how to explain to her teenager why posting certain content online could have future consequences. These conversations signal a society beginning to reckon with surveillance capitalism’s implications.
The question is not whether we can eliminate surveillance it is whether we can build a digital economy that respects human dignity and autonomy. I believe we can, but it will require something more radical than privacy settings. It will require reimagining our relationship with technology altogether.
Reference
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.
Lyon, D. (2022). Pandemic surveillance: Privacy, security, and data ethics in the post-COVID world. Polity Press.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
West, S. M. (2019). Data capitalism: Redefining the logics of surveillance and privacy. Business & Society, 58(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185